60 Minutes In The Spotlight?
Daniel Allen says:
To Whom It May Concern:
The video posted on your YouTube page: “The Zeitgeist Movement Wasn’t Worth 60 Minutes…” is unauthorized. I produced this video and posted to Vimeo and allow embedding but I do not authorize posting my video on other users’ accounts. You may embed the video wherever you like using our Vimeo information. However, I must request that you take down the unauthorized version of our video immediately.
Please address this message immediately or we will be forced to take further action.
Thank you,
Daniel T. Allen
dantallen@gmail.com
dantallen@gmail.com
justintempler says:
Daniel Allen says:
I produced this video and posted to Vimeo and allow embedding but I do not authorize posting my video on other users’ accounts. You may embed the video wherever you like using our Vimeo information
Daniel Allen’s Vimeo page says:
Embed this video
Sorry, embedding has been disabled by the owner of this video.
internetjimjesus says:
It’s not like Mario is monitizing the video, or 60 Minutes either for that matter. He’s also not taking credit for your work. You’re getting tons of free exposure for a good story. What’s the issue?
Mario Brotha says:
I don’t know what the issue is, but now we have Peter Joseph Merola releasing a response, will he flag this video too ?He starts off whining as usual saying the movies are not the movement in so many ways as any critic would have predicted, again and again and compares it to saying it’s like saying that Google Zeitgeist is TZM ? Was he a Google employee ? If so, I didn’t know.I did notice something tho, BCE says that the “Who Is Peter Joseph” fake documentary was a 2010 interview, no, it was in October 21, 2009, in the beginning of the “Charles Robinson” film, that’s stated. Danny deserves an F lol. I’m trying to be fair here and I didn’t notice that the first time watching the original BCE video.But Peter Joseph Merola when talking about the 3rd section of the first film pretends it wasn’t addressing anything about the monetary system and it’s “inherent” problems. The first film alone can be looked at as anti-monetary system from watching that part alone and when the movement introduces a new economic system thru the next film, they are going to always go to the first film because of that, not because of 9/11 or his beef with Jesus. Those will always be issues tho. Shit, some of it was rehashed in the beginning of Zeitgeist: Addendum. There was some railing going on here, sorry Peter Joseph Merola, ABC doesn’t have an agenda against you. Denying the first film is a recruitment tool is extremely misleading since he promotes it as a sticky in the forums of his website:Then he goes on to bash people that see things controlled by a elite group when the 3rd section of the first film was called “The Men Behind The Curtain”, yeah, you can tell me that part isn’t there no more since he updated the first film about 5-10 times, but he’s not fooling anyone. I think he’s a hypocrite for saying that tho.In the middle of this response, he states that he’s confident he can debate anyone about the first film as if he is known debater, but when you listen to his past interviews about the first film, he always claim he didn’t want to debate and just discuss. Now he’s the ultimate debater. He’s starting to get arrogant here, and annoying. I also found it odd that he didn’t mention the part where the interviewer mentions that TZM has over 500,000 members and try to make that his trophy moment, instead, he bashes the scholar because TZM is against people with credentials. That’s right.Then he rants on about how BCE said “supercomputers”, well, isn’t that was TVP offers ? That sounds SCIFI to me, I do tho like how he didn’t taboo the whole split drama. Because Jacque Fresco said “The Zeitgeist Movement knows nothing”. I felt like rubbing that in.Then Peter Joseph Merola takes the time to talk about the Jared Lee Loughner incident and says the best friend last saw him 2 years ago. Okay, that would be 2009. Yeah. That makes sense, for some reason he tries to act as if TZM wasn’t active then. Then he says “What the hell is a documentary movement” ? Is he fucking kidding me ?Then Peter Joseph Merola refers to Mr. Kill Money as “Dr. Kill Money”. I don’t know if this was a subliminal shot at me or if that was a slip up, either way, funny. But what’s even funnier is that Peter Joseph Merola cuts out the part where BCE promoted James Kush’s blog and the artlcle that highlighted TZM as an “apocalyptic cult”. That was sneaky. I thought he would call out the people that called TZM a cult, deny TZM to be a cult, but that didn’t happen, I guess he’s that scared to address the issue.I would recommend everyone to check out James Kush’s blog about the matter:He analyzed the original BCE video, I analyzed this.
